← Back to Research Studies

Cawston Press: What UK Consumers Really Think

What do UK consumers actually think when they see "no added sugar, no concentrates, no sweeteners" on a premium fruit drink? I ran a study with 6 UK consumers to find out how Cawston Press's core messaging lands with real shoppers. The findings are nuanced, occasionally brutal, and genuinely useful.

The Consumers

We spoke to 6 UK adults aged 28-53 from across England and Northern Ireland. The group included a cybersecurity analyst from Sheffield, a single dad and network engineer from Birmingham, a maintenance technician from Liverpool, a CAD technician from Croydon, a carers support coordinator from Armagh, and a marketing professional from Manchester. All are budget-conscious, health-aware, and sceptical of premium pricing claims.

Question 1: The "No Sugar, No Concentrate" Message

We asked consumers for their honest reaction to Cawston Press's core claim. The verdict was unanimous: "no sweeteners" is the winner. As Marta from Sheffield put it: "I can taste that fake stuff a mile off and it tastes metallic."

But "no added sugar" triggered scepticism. Gareth from Northern Ireland was blunt: "Gut reaction? Marketing. No added sugar sounds grand, but it's still full of fruit sugar and it's still a can of pop."

Key insight: Lead with the sweetener-free angle over "no added sugar."

Question 2: The Price Premium Problem

Daniel from Manchester didn't mince words: "At £2 a can, I'm out. That's 'nice branding, but I'll drink tap water' territory." The sweet spot is £1-1.20 for single cans, under 90p in multi-packs.

Key insight: The £1.50-£2 price point is above threshold for regular purchase.

Question 3: Heritage and Gifting

The heritage story earned respect, but limited trust: "It's a trust boost, not a free pass." On gifting, the verdict: "awkward" as standalone gifts.

Recommendations

  • Lead with "no artificial sweeteners" over "no added sugar"

  • Price multi-packs to hit under 90p per can

  • Consider smaller 150-200ml format

  • Back heritage claims with sustainability credentials

Conclusion

Cawston Press has genuine strengths: the no-sweetener message lands, heritage provides credibility, and the product is seen as higher quality. But there's a price disconnect. The opportunity: lean into sweetener-free messaging, be transparent about sugar, and find price points that justify the premium.

This study was conducted using Ditto's synthetic consumer research platform. Book a demo at askditto.io.

What the Consumers Said

Gareth McAlister, 53, Armagh: "Gut reaction? Marketing. No added sugar sounds grand, but it's still full of fruit sugar and it's still a can of pop."

Daniel Whitaker, 33, Manchester: "At £2 a can, I'm out. That's 'nice branding, but I'll drink tap water' territory."

Marta Kowalska, 28, Sheffield: "I'm not paying an artisan tax for a sugar hit."

Read the full research study here: View Full Study

Sophie O'Leary

About the author

Sophie O'Leary

Sophie O’Leary works at the intersection of agentic AI and growth, helping founders, startups and business use agentic AI effectively.

She's an angel investor and has worked at some of the world's top growth-stage companies. Sophie is based in the Los Angeles area and studied at Harvard Business School.

Related Studies


Ready to Experience Synthetic Persona Intelligence?

See how population-true synthetic personas can transform your market research and strategic decision-making.

Book a Demo