← Back to Research Studies

PA Voters on Democratic Economic Messaging: What Works

PA Voter Research Infographic

Pennsylvania is ground zero for the 2026 midterms. Multiple competitive House races, a swing-state electorate, and voters who will decide whether Democrats take back the majority.

The DCCC's core message is that Republicans are "tanking the economy, gutting Medicaid, and making everything more expensive." But does that message actually land with Pennsylvania voters?

We asked 6 PA voters. Their feedback was honest, nuanced, and actionable.

Finding #1: "Tanking the Economy" Sounds Like Spin

Voters acknowledge that costs are up. Significantly up.

"My groceries ran about $110 a week a few years back," one voter told us. "Now it's closer to $150-$165, same cart, more shrinkflation. Truck insurance jumped, electric and garbage ticked up."

But when asked if the Democratic attack line resonates, the answer was more complicated: "Parts of it hit, but mostly it sounds like spin to me."

The disconnect: voters feel the cost increases, but they don't necessarily blame Republicans — and the hyperbolic framing undermines credibility.

Finding #2: Voters Want "Adults in the Room"

When we asked about the single most important issue, the economy dominated — but the framing was specific.

"Family cost of living and boring, on-time budgets," one voter said. "I want adults in the room. No shutdown games. Give clear dates and deadlines, hit them, stop promising the moon."

What voters want to hear isn't grand policy promises — it's competence, stability, and specificity. They're tired of drama. They want someone who will show up, do the job, and avoid making things worse.

Finding #3: Skip the National Pep Rally

We asked what Democratic candidates should say — and avoid — when door-knocking.

"Talk to me about costs, local fixes, and basic services," one voter said. "Skip the slogans. Leave the DC talk at the curb."

Another was blunter: "Skip the national pep rally and talk about the stuff on my receipt and my phone bill."

The pattern is clear: local beats national. Specifics beat slogans. Showing up beats shouting.

What This Means for 2026

For Democratic campaigns in Pennsylvania battleground districts, this research suggests a messaging recalibration:

1. Tone down the attack lines — "Tanking the economy" is too hyperbolic. Voters feel the pain but don't buy the framing. More credible: "Costs are up and nothing's been done."

2. Emphasise competence over ideology — Voters want "adults in the room." Steady budgets, no shutdown games, showing up and doing the work. Less vision, more reliability.

3. Go local on the doors — National talking points backfire. Talk about grocery prices, utility bills, local infrastructure. Be specific about dates and dollar amounts.

Test Your Messaging in Real Time

This study took about 15 minutes to run. For campaigns that need to move fast, Ditto provides real-time voter feedback before you commit to messaging or mail.

Read the full research study here: View Full PA Voter Study

Sophie O'Leary

About the author

Sophie O'Leary

Sophie O’Leary works at the intersection of agentic AI and growth, helping founders, startups and business use agentic AI effectively.

She's an angel investor and has worked at some of the world's top growth-stage companies. Sophie is based in the Los Angeles area and studied at Harvard Business School.

Related Studies


Ready to Experience Synthetic Persona Intelligence?

See how population-true synthetic personas can transform your market research and strategic decision-making.

Book a Demo